How Do You Beat Scram Alcohol Monitoring Anklet

¿¿¿¡¡¡ THRONES GAME FUCKING TO A NEWBORN BABY ???!!! Is this art, morbid, perversion, porn ,.... movies? Is this FILM TO SERBIA?

has been much controversy in recent days with the subject of the complaint has been brought against Ángel Sala, Director Sitges Film Festival . A judge in Vilanova i la Geltrú charged with a crime of child pornography in that event to allow the viewing of a film in which, according to some viewers offended, have been pretty gruesome scenes but especially for a couple who are ... "Constitute a crime?

The film in question is A serbian film, to be exact and the two scenes in question is one that is seen violation of a newborn baby (even with the blood of childbirth) and the sodomy of a child of 5 years by her father, the protagonist (ironic that one of the jokes I read the other day in the comic Haw by Ivan Brunetti off a guy raping a newborn baby and the doctor saying that at least is expected to cut the umbilical cord, which face imagine my surprise when I read the controversial scene of that film . To give you an idea of \u200b\u200bthe humor of that comic you have one of the jokes to accompany this text.) But let us continue with the theme, judging by the trailer that you have at the end of this post in your band network version, ie, uncensored) and you can guess that the director (a certain Srdjan Spasojevic ) has not cut his hair when images show the descent into hell of a porn star retired back to the office to work in a snuff movie, but to what extent is reprehensible?

I'll explain so you do not get me wrong, I think FAIL COMPLETELY not just the act of committing brutal crimes such as raping a newborn baby (which I doubt that weak little body does not suffer from such barbarism without suffering lacerations least ) or sodomy (or any kind of sex) with a minor, but all kinds of sexual abuse against children (I do cross there are depraved excitement about it because my one or less I can pick up many feelings, but they certainly are not sexual, least of all in so little kids of age as in this example)

What happens sometimes to criticize something you run the risk of crossing the fine line between conviction and approval "?: it is an example far removed from this but in time the South Park movie was criticized for its strong language but the funny thing is that the film boasted but not supposed to criticize him. Another example would be the Tarantino film , repeatedly accused of promoting violence (just see the script of his that after several changes the film ended up being born Murders of Oliver Stone, or some of the titles signed by himself as the famous Pulp Fiction )

What do I mean? I conclude, without having seen A serbian film that the director's intention is to criticize the vicious world of snuff movies, but instead of hinting as it did Alejandro Amenabar Tesis in has opted for the show, but always with reservations: as I read the scene of the rape of a newborn is done with a doll and the sodomy of the boy of 5 years is not as explicit as you can imagine (I think that pedophilia and / or child abuse is also a crime in the country of origin of director) The rest I guess is something bordering on the pornographic erotic with regard to sex gore mixed with the commercial product line Saw type, attached thereto to the probable intention of the director of cause, which probably means that many scenes are deliberately carried over (as it go which has further raised this controversy, or one in which the protagonist cuts his head to the woman who is fornicating)

Is criticism? No doubt, like everything in this life, but what is objectionable? NO, the individual must always have the freedom to watch whatever they want and judge for yourself, not others judge him. So it seems absurd to claim that caused this controversy because apart from being just free publicity for the film, if you do not like what he sees have been reported before, or else leaves the room (or change of TV channel, because the bottom of this criticism would be perfectly extrapolated to controversial content according to certain television programs. Now that it is also judged that these programs reach the audiences they reach, but that would be another topic of discussion ... ) Complementary to the post by adding a parody of that case.